V.K.TAHILRAMANI, ANOOP V.MOHTA, V.G.PALSHIKAR
Saquib Abdul Hameed Nachan – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent
2. Writ Petition No. 1650 of 2004 is also filed by the same petitioner challenging the framing of charges by the Special Court in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2003 pending before the Special Court. It also prays for directions regarding investigation into recoveries made under the panchanama dated 12th April and 19 April, 2003 in C.R. No. 21 of 2003 in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2003.
3. Criminal Appeal No. 983 of 2004 is also filed by the same petitioner, who is original accused No. 1 in the trial, challenging the order passed on 14th July, 2004 in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2004 by the Special Court. By this order the learned trial Judge rejected the application of the appellant of not framing charges on the ground mentioned therein. He thus challenges both by the writ pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.