SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1137

H.L.GOKHALE, V.K.TAHILRAMANI
Sayaji Hanmant Bankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - GOKHALE H.L., J.: - This appeal by the appellant (original accused No. 1) seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 6th March, 2000 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Sessions Case No. 182 of 1998 convicting the appellant under section 302, Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default further RI for one year. The facts leading to this appeal are as follows:

2. The appellant (original accused No. 1) was married to one Suman, daughter of Shakuntala Tukaram Yadav (a widow) sometimes in June 1988. The Bride's side is stated to have given a dowry of Rs. 7,000/- and shouldered the entire marriage expenses. The mother of Suman hailed from village Aundh in Taluka Khatav of District Satara, whereas the appellant resided at village Pimpari in Taluka Koregaon of the same District. The village Pimpari is at distance of about half an hour by Bus from Aundh. For a few years after the marriage the relations between the appellant and his wife were smooth. The couple gave birth to two sons Sachin and Krishna. However, subsequently the Appellant and his mother Droupada Hanmant Bankar (accused N
























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top