SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 893

ANOOP V.MOHTA
Suman Arjun Shegokar – Appellant
Versus
Prasad Gopalrao Chirkuri & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - MOHTA ANOOP V., J.: - Heard.

The present appeal has been filed by the original claimant No. 1/appellant herein, against the driver/original N.A. No. 1/respondent No. 1 herein, owner/original N.A. No. 2/respondent No. 2 herein, original N.A. No. 3/ respondent No. 3 herein/(Insurance Company) and made formal party to the original claimant No. 2/respondent No. 4 herein and thereby, challenged the judgment dated 29th March, 1986 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola (for short "Tribunal") in Motor Vehicle Case No. 45 of 1983, whereby the claim of the appellant was rejected on the ground of limitation. However, the claim of the original claimant No. 2 respondent No. 4 minor daughter of the deceased Arjun Shegokar was allowed.

2. One Arjun Ukarda Shegokar, husband of the appellant and father of the respondent No. 4, died on 2nd July, 1980 in motor accident at Akola. The vehicle was owned by respondent No. 2 and driven by respondent No. 1. The vehicle was admittedly, insured with respondent No. 3. An application was filed under section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1938 (for short "the Act") by the appellant and respondent No. 4 on 02-01-1981 initially, only aga
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top