SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Bom) 43

H.SURESH, M.M.QAZI, M.B.GHODESWAR
Khimbhadhur Palshiram Thapa – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

H. Suresh, J. - This is an application for bail in the two cases bearing C.R. No 257 of 1988 and C.R. No 422 of 1988. In the first case, the petitioner has been charged under Sections. 302, 149, 143, 147 and 148 of Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act In die other case, namely, C.R. No 422 of 1988 the Petitioner has been charged under Section 307 read with Sections 149, 332 read with 149, Section 224 read with 149 Section 333 read with 149, Section 341 read with 149, Sections 143, 147 and 148 of Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act. The Petitioner surrendered to the Police on 18-10-88. The Petitioner was produced before the learned Magistrate on 19-10-88 and he was remanded to the police custody. On 5-1-89, which was the 79th day of his being in custody the learned Magistrate remanded the Petitioner to the judicial custody till 19-1-89, which would be the 93rd day. Mr. Ponda says that that order remanding the Petitioner to the custody beyond 90th day is illegal.

2. However, on the 9th of January 1989, a charge-sheet was filed in the Court of the. Metropolitan Magistrate27th Court, Mulund Bombay. The learned Magistrate on tha















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top