SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Bom) 106

A.A.DESAI
Prahlad – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT (ORAL)

A.A. Desai, J. - Question as posed in this application pertains to applicability of proviso to sub-Section 2 of Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code) in the matter of grant of bail under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ("the Act").

2. The applicant was arrested on 1-12-1989 on having found in possession 4.90 Kgs of Ganja. He is, therefore, being prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 20 of the Act. The prosecution on 6-2-1990 filed a chargesheet i.e. beyond 60 days.

3. Mr. Sirpurkar, the Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, therefore, asserted that the applicant is entitled, to be released on bail in view of the provisions laid down in proviso (a) to sub-Section (2) of Section 167 of that Code. He placed reliance on the decision delivered by the Supreme Court in case of Rajnikant v. Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau1. The applicant-Rajanikant in that case was prosecuted for the offence punishable under the Act. The Supreme Court has observed that a right to bail under these provisions is absolute. The Magistrate has no power to remand a person beyond the stipulated period. He mus



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top