SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 141

2002 (2) Crimes 268
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
(AT GOA PANAJI BENCH)
P. V. Hardas, J.
Babu Govekar -AppeIlant
versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 27 of 2001
Deciided on 8-2-2002
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellant: Mr. S.G.. Desai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Arun ~ras de Sa. Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. A.P. Lawande, Public Prosecutor

Headnote:Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21 and 22 Recovery of 6 grams of heroin and 17 Tablets of Methylene Dioxyamphetamine BCL from possession of accused - Appeal against conviction - Burden on prosectution to establish offence against accused is much stricter than burden on accused to sustain his defence - Accused has to only probablise his defence by preponderance of probabilities – Evidence showed that accused was not apprehended or accosted in manner which was set out in panchanama or deposed by police Merely because appellant had not made a reference or taken a defence that contraband was planted could not detract from veracity the defence statement – Defence witnesses were entitled to atment with those of procetuion - Conviction was liable to be set-side. (Paras 13 to 17)

       Result : Appeal allowed.

       

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

The Appellant has filed the present Appeal challenging the conviction and sentence passed by the Special Judge. N.D.P.S. Court. Mapusa. in Special Criminal Case No.20/2000 convitting the AppeIlant for an offence punishable under Se'ctions 21 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 1985 and sentencing him for th.e aforesaid offence. on each count to uhdergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years and to .pay fine of Rs. 1.00.000/- in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for 6 months. It is this aforesaid conviction and sentence that is challenged in the present Appeal by the Appellant.

2. The facts necessary for the decision of the Appeal are set out hereunder:

On 13th January. 2000. at about 11.00 a.m. two panchas namely P.W.3. Francis Almeida and Sadat Nizamuddin. both Government servants. working in the Director of EsIucation. panaji. were summoned by P.I. Shri Lavu Mamledar(P.W.6) to the Anti Narcotic Cell. Panaji to act as panch witnesses. On the same day. at about 5:00 p.m.. P.W.4. P.S.I. Uday Naik. Had received a specific and reliable information that one person by name Babu Govekar. aged 21 years would becoming to deliver a consignment of drugs to his customers near Starcob junction at Anjuna between 11.00 p.m. to 11.30 p.m. P.W.4, P.S.I. U.day Naik, had reduced the said information into writing and a copy of that information was givera. to P.W.5. Shri Shirish Thorat. The said information, Exh. P.W.4/E was received by P.W.5, Dy. S.P. Shri Thorat on the same may i.e. on 13th January, 2000 at about 5.00 p.m. The original of P.W.4/E is at Exh. P.W.4/D. P.W.5, .Dy. S.P. Shri Thorat, has acknowledged the receipt of the information on Exh. P.W.4/E at point "Y". The panchas who were then present in the Anti Narcotic Cell, Panaji were introduced to the members of the raiding party which comprised of P.W.5, Dy. S.P. Shri Shirish Thorat, P.W.6, P.I. Lavu Mamledar, P.S.I. Shri Salim Shaikh, Shri prabhudessai, P.W.4, P.S.1. Uday Naik and other Police Officials. The raiding party, comprising of the Police Officers referred to above, left the Police Station at about 10.00 p.m. on 13th January, 2000 in two private four wheelers and two private two wheelers and proceeded to Anjuna at the Starco junction. P.W.4, P.S.I, Uday Naik, was carrying a seal of Anti Narcotic Cell, Panaji, Goa-2 with Ashoka Emblem and one constable Devidas Gawas was carrying with him a kit box containing weighing, packing and sealing materials and Head Constable Mohan Naik, was carrying a typewriter.

3. According to the prosecution, the raiding party parked their vehicles near Starco junction and concealed themselves behind the vehicles. At about 11.30 p.m., they saw one person coming towards the lane from Starco junction and since his description tallied with the description of the person delivering the consignment or drugs, this person was accosted by the members of the raiding party. P.W.4, Uday Naik, identified himself as P.S.I, of Anti Narcotic Cell and on questioning, the said person disclosed his name as Babu Sadashiv Govekar, P.W.4, P.S.I. Uday Naik, then introduced the members of the raiding party to Babu Govekar. At about 11.40 p.m., P.W.4, P.S.I. Uday Naik, then informed Babu Govekar, that he had received a specific and reliable information that he had come to deliver the consignment of drugs to his customers and, therefore, P.W.4, P.S.I. Uday Naik, wanted to take the personal search of the said person Babu Govekar, P.W.4, P.S.I. Uday Naik, then informed him that Babu Govekar had a right to be searched either before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate but the said person Babu Govekar declined the offer. P.W.4, P.S.I. Uday Naik, then informed Babu Govekar that he had a right to search the members of the raiding party including the panchas but again Babu Govekar declined to exercise that right. Thereafter, P.W.4, P.S.I. Uday Naik, then conducted the personal search of Babu Govekar and during the personal search, P.W.4, P.S.I. Uday Naik, found one small trans






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top