SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Bom) 312

VISHNU SAHAI, S.S.PARKAR
Murlidhar Genuji Tupe – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vishnu Sabai, J. - By means of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the Judgment dated 17th December, 1981 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No. 86 of 1981, convicting and sentencing him in the manner stated hereinafter -

(i) Under Section 302 IPC to imprisonment for life; and

(ii) Under Section 323 IPC to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- i/d R.I. for 15 days.

Briefly stated the prosecution case runs as under :

P.W. 4 Chhabubai Ganpat Tupe and P.W. 5 Ashok Ganpat Tupe are the wife and son of the deceased Ganpat Genu Tupe respectively. The appellant was the younger brother of the deceased. Relations between the deceased, Chhabubai and Ashok on one side and the appellant on the other were highly strained. The cause of contention between the parties was a well jointly owned by them. It is alleged that on 7th May, 1981, at about 2-2.30 p.m., Ganpat took the bullocks to the well for water. 'That well was situated at a distance of about 50 feet from the houses of Ganpat and appellant which were adjoining. It is said that the appellant did not allow Ganpat to take water from the aforesaid well and hence, he came back to the









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top