SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Bom) 406

VISHNU SAHAI, T.K.CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Vilas Pandurang Patil – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vishnu Sahai, J. - Through this appeal, the State of Maharashtra (appellant) impugns the Judgment and order dated 15-12-1984, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. Sangli in Sessions Case No. 26 of 1984 acquitting the respondent for offences punishable under Sections 302 I.P.C. and 404 I.P.C. Since this appeal was beyond time by 76 days. Criminal Application No., 847 of 1985 was moved by the State of Maharashtra for condonation of delay. On the said application a Division Bench of this court issued Rule. After hearing learned counsel for the parties we are satisfied that sufficient cause for explaining the delay in preferring the appeal has been shown and consequently we make the Rule absolute.

2. In short. the prosecution case runs as under:

The deceased Suman was the first wife of the respondent. Since the relations between her and the respondent were strained and she did not have good relations with her in-laws. She started living separately from the respondent along with her 3 daughters Suvarna. P.W. 3 Vanita. P.W. 4 and Vaishali and son. Vijay in her house in village. Khujgaon in District Sangli. In the said village in another house the respondent along with his sec

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top