SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 46

1999(2) Crimes 362
BOMBAY HIGH COURT (DB)
G.D. Patil S.D. Gundewar, JJ.
Abdul Rashid - Appellant
versus
The State of Maharashtra -Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 288 of 1996
Decided on 27-1-1999
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellant: Shri M.R. Daga. Advocate.
For the Respondent: Shri A.G. Mujumdar. Addl P.P.

Headnote:Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 21Recovery of 350 grms. of charas from possession of appellant - Conviction - 20 grins. of charas was taken out sample but quantity received by Analyst was only 16 grams - No explanation by prosecution for discrepancy-It was serious infirmity in prosecution case and was fatal- Conviction was liable to be set aside. (Paras 6 & 7)

       Result: Appeal allowed.

       

JUDGMENT

S.D. Gundewar. J. - This appeal under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code is directed against the judgment and order dated 7-9-1991 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge. Nagpur in Sessions Case No. 433/91, whereby he has convicted the appellant/accused under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act ("hereinafter referred to as the Act") and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years with a fine of Rupees One Lakh and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the prosecution case are that on 21-3-1991 at about 11.10 A.M. P.S.L Gangaram Sakharkar (PW. 3) then attached to the Crime Branch. Nagpur left the office of Crime Branch along with his staff and necessary material for conducting raids in case of receiving any information about the narcotic drugs. An entry to that effect was made in the station diary. On way when he happened to be infront of Mominpura Chowki; he received an information that one long faced slim person aged about 35 to 36 years. named Abdul Rashid possessed and was clandestinely making sale of Charas by standing infront of Kadari Sadi Centre on Timki road. Having received the said information PSI Sakharkar fetched two panchas, namely. Dnyaneshwar Kadwe and Mohammad Jamir and apprised them of the sum and substance of the information received by him and after they agreed to act as panchas informed his superior official. A.C.P. Paraskar of Crime Branch. Nagpur about the same on phone and on obtaining oral permission from A.C.P. Paraskar for conducting the raid on the said person PSI Sakharkar- noted down the said information and proceeded "towards Kadari Sadi Centre for carrying out the raid. On reaching there-the raiding party noticed that a person of the description given in the information was present there. He was having a hand bag with him. He was encircled by the members of the raiding party PSI Sakharkar then disclosed his identity to the said person and asked him about his name and address. Thereupon the said person gave out his name and address as Abdul Rashid @ Mama s/o Mohammad Yusuf. resident of Bakra Mandi, Mominpura, Nagpur being the appellant/accused. The purpose of the raid was informed to the appellant. H e was also informed that he was entitled to have his personal search being taken either before any Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate to which the appellant showed no inclination. PSI Sakharkar and all the members of the raiding party including panch as then gave their personal searches to the appellant and thereafter personal search of the appellant was taken in the presence of panchas. In the course of his personal search two black coloured cakes of Charas wrapped in polythene paper and a sum of Rs. 900/-in cash were found in the hand bag which the appellant had with him. Total weight of Charas found with the appellant was about 320 Grams. Out of the same. 20 grams of Charas was taken as sample in one packet. The sample packet of Charas the packet containing remaining Charas and a sum of Rs. 900/- in cash were then seized, sealed and labelled separately. A detailed panchnama (Exh. 8) of the same was drawn on the spot. a copy of which was given to the appellant and his signature was obtained on the Panchnama in token of the receipt of its copy. The appellant was then taken to Tahsil Police Station along with the seized property, where PSI Sakharkar lodged his report (Exh. 14) in the matter on the basis of which an offence came to be registered as Crime No. 185/91. Before that PSI Sakharkar submitted his special report (Exh-15) to his superior officer. A sample of Charas was sent to Chemical Analyser, Nagpur for analysis and after completion of investigation. Charge sheet came to be filed in Sessions Court, Nagpur on 5-6-1991.

3. A charge (Exh. 3) was framed against the appellant under Section 21 of the Act to which the appellant pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tri








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top