SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 514

A.B.PALKAR, G.D.PATIL
Madhukar Gopichand Sapate – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.B. Palkar. J. - The appellant having been convicted - of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one month by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur on 30,3.1994 in Sessions Trial 'No. 743 of 1990 has challenged the said order of conviction and sentence in this appeal. The case of prosecution in brief is as below.

2. The appellant was married to Usha daughter of Govinda Atkari, resident of Usargondi, District Bhandara. The marriage was performed about 2-3 years prior to the incident which took place on 18-7-1990 at about 7.00 a.m. After marriage. Usha was residing at Sirsoli with the accused and had given birth to a child about two months prior to the incident. After initial marital life there used to be quarrels between Usha and the accused on petty matters and he was ill-treating her. There is, however no allegation that at any time there was any demand for non satisfaction of which quarrels took place.

3. On 18-7-1990 at about 7.00 a.m. accused asked Usha as to why she did not go to the field




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top