P.V.KAKADE, R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NOBILETTO FINLEASE AND INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. – Respondent
R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.
( 1 ) HEARD. Rule. By consent, the rule is made returnable forthwith.
( 2 ) THE petitioner seeks to quash the complaint dated 6-11-2004 stated to have been filed by the respondent No. 1 with the respondent No. 2 and further, for the direction to restrain the respondent No. 2 from carrying out the investigation in relation to the said complaint.
( 3 ) IT is the case of the petitioner that in the course of its regular business, it had sanctioned loan to the respondent No. 1 and accordingly had disbursed an amount of Rs. 1,45,00,000/- in terms of the loan agreement dated 15-9-2000. Having obtained the said loan, the respondent No. 1 issued three post-dated cheques - one dated 1-7-2002 towards the repayment of the principal amount of rs. 1,45,00,000/- and the remaining two dated 15-9-2001 - one for a sum of rs. 18,09,600/- towards the interest payable upto 15-9-2001 and another for rs. 14,32,807/- towards the interest payable for the period from 15-9-2001 to 30-6-2002. The cheques towards the interest payment were issued after deduction of the tax at source. The respondent No. 1 also deposited the shares of various companies by way of pledge in pursuan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.