SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 634

P.V.KAKADE, R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
PRADNYA PRADEEP KENKARE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Judgment

R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.

( 1 ) HEARD. Rule. By consent, the rule is made returnable forthwith.

( 2 ) THE petitioners seek to quash the FIR No. 640 of 2004 dated 25th november, 2004 registered at Jogeshwari Police Station, Mumbai, on the ground that the same does not disclose any offence having been committed by the petitioners under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) Act, 1989, hereinafter called as "the said Act".

( 3 ) IT is the case of the petitioners that one Ankush Ramchandra Jadhav was appointed as Assistant Teacher on 12th June, 1989 in Arvind Gandbhir High school run by Jogeshwari Education Society wherein the petitioner No. 1 is the head Mistress since 1999, and prior to that, she was Assistant Head Mistress since 1997. The petitioner No. 2 is a Tax Consultant since the year 1992 and is working as Hon. Secretary of the said High School. The services of Ankush jadhav were terminated in a disciplinary proceedings against him. However, pursuant to the order of the School Tribunal, he was reinstated in the service. After the termination of his services and till he was reinstated in accordance with the order of School Tribunal, the sai







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top