SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 938

H.L.GOKHALE, R.S.DALVI
Anandrao Yashwantrao Nalawade – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

H. L. GOKHALE, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus against the State of Maharashtra and its officers (and particulars against Commissioner for Sugar) to either appoint an Administrator or a Board of administrators to respondent No. 5-Sugar Co- operative Factory situated at Sangli, of which respondent Nos. 6 to 20 are its Directors. The prayer is made since elections to respondent no. 5-Sugar Co-operative factory are not being held although the statutory period of 5 years is over long back. The petitioners are the members of respondent No. 5-Sugar Co- operative factory. The interim prayer is also to the same effect. The State of Maharashtra, secretary, Co-operatives, Commissioner for sugar and Collector of Sangli, are respondent nos. 1 to 4, respectively. The Commissioner for Sugar is also the Registrar in Sugar Co- operatives under the Maharashtra Co-operative societies Act, 1960.

( 2 ) LOOKING to the prayers in this petition, we were of the view that the petition should be disposed of at the admission stage itself inasmuch as any interim order would almost amount to allowing the petition and, therefore, a notice was given recording that, if possible,



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top