SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 840

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, D.D.SINHA
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra State Mining Corporation – Respondent


Judgment

D. D. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Mrs. Kalyani marpakwar (Deshpande), learned Counsel for petitioner and Mr. A. B. Choudhari, learned counsel for respondent.

( 2 ) THE learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that on 16-11-1974, the petitioner was appointed as Mines Foreman and was posted at Pohara Mines in Bhandara district. The petitioner was confirmed on the post of Junior Mining Engineer by order dated 13-08-1991. On 15-09-1983, the petitioner resigned from the post. In the year 1986 the petitioner again applied to the respondent for appointment on the post of Mining Engineer/ first Class Mines Manager, on the fixed pay of rs. 1,550/- per month plus other allowances in the pay scale of Rs. 1100 - 50 - 1550 - 75 - 1700. On 5-02-1988, the petitioner was confirmed on the post of Mining Engineer/first class Mining Manager w. e. f. 07-04-1987.

( 3 ) THAT on 10-08-1988, the petitioner was transferred to Nagpur. On 19-08-1988, the petitioner was placed under suspension for contemplated enquiry. On 15-02-1989, memorandum of charges was handed over to the petitioner. The charge was under Rule 10 (B) (iii) of the Conduct, Discipline and Appeal rules of the Respondent. There were to




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top