SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 882

A.P.SHAH, D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
P. A. INAMDAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Judgment

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

( 1 ) RULE, by consent returnable forthwith. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents waives service. By consent of Counsel and at their request taken up for hearing and final disposal.

( 2 ) IN this batch of petitions, a decision arrived at by the Pravesh Niyantran samiti on 10th June, 2005 of declining to enhance the management quota for admissions at professional institutions established and administered by minorities, from 50% to 100% of the total intake has been called into question. The Samiti was set up by the Government of Maharashtra in pursuance of the decision of the Supreme Court in Islamic Academy of Education vs. State of karnataka, (2003)6 SCC 697. The three institutions in question in the three petitions before the Court, provide instruction in Architecture, Pharmacy and management Sciences. None of the institutions is in receipt of grant-in-aid from the State Government or the Central Government. There is no dispute before the court about the position that these three institutions have been established and are being administered by a religious minority consisting of persons who practice and profess Islam.

( 3 ) THE judgment of t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top