SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1029

P.B.GAIKWAD, V.G.MUNSHI
Bhagwat Sudam Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

P. B. GAIKWAD, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants- original accused Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 have filed criminal Appeal No. 192 of 1996, challenging the judgment and order of conviction and sentence, passed by the learned Additional sessions Judge, Ambajogai, dated 23-4-1996 in Sessions Case No. 28 of 1992, convicting them for the offences punishable under sections 147,148, 324 read with 149 of Indian penal Code (IPC) and sentencing them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs. 300/- in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month. The appellant-original accused No. 4 has filed Criminal Appeal No. 242 of 1996, challenging the order of conviction and sentence passed in the same Sessions Case against him, for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 149 of IPC and directing him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months so also convicting and sentencing him for the offences punishable under Sections 147 and 148 of IPC and directing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of rs. 300/ -. Criminal Appeal No. 586 of 1996 is filed by the State, challe



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top