SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1074

A.B.NAIK
RAFIUDDIN NURUDDIN MUSALMAN – Appellant
Versus
ABDUYL KARIM ABDUL REHEMAN – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) BY this petition, the petitioner original defendant no. 2 has challenged the judgment and decree passed by the learned Assistant judge, Dhule on 16-1-1984 allowing the appeal filed by the plaintiff and setting aside the judgment and decree passed by learned 3rd Joint Civil Judge (J. D.) dhule, on 31-12-1981, dismissing the suit filed by the plaintiff. The present respondent is original plaintiff. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as the plaintiff and defendant respectively. Respondent No. 2 herein was original defendant who died during pendency of the proceedings and his two heirs were brought on record. In order to understand the controversy/point raised in this petition, the facts which are borne by the record are required to be stated.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff instituted a suit in the Court of 3rd Joint Civil Judge (J. D.) dhule, for possession of house CTS No. 4373-B, situate at Dhule proper (hereinafter referred to as suit house ). It is contended by the plaintiff that the suit house is owned by him as he has purchased the suit house from defendant No. 1 under registered sale deed dated 1-5-1975 for a consideration of Rs. 7,000/ -. Accordingly, a sale deed c













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top