SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 771

V.M.KANADE
Sangayya Panchkatti Matt – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) THE Appellant/original accused is challenging the Judgment and Order passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, panaji in Sessions Case No. 7 of 2002. By the said Judgment and Order dated 25th May, 2004, the Additional Sessions Judge was pleased to convict the Appellant for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence him to undergo Simple imprisonment for 2 years and also impose a fine of Rs. 2000/- and in default to undergo simple Imprisonment for a further period of 2 months. The Additional Sessions Judge also convicted the Appellant for an offence punishable under Section 185 of the Motor vehicles Act, 1988 and to undergo Simple imprisonment for 3 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default to undergo Simple imprisonment for a period of 1 month.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case in brief is that on 30-3-2001 at about 4. 10 hours the accused was driving a Tata Estate Car and at that time was under the influence of alcohol and in this condition he deliberately tried to knock down Police Inspector S. R. Goltekar of the Porvorim Police Station who was on night duty at the relevant time. The prosecution case is that the Police Ins






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top