SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 727

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, A.P.SHAH
Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment - CHANDRACHUD D. Y. , J.

( 1 ) THE constitutional validity of the Maharashtra regional and Town Planning (Amendment) Act, 1992 - Maharashtra act 16 of 1992 - has been challenged in these proceedings. By this amendment, the State legislature inserted Chapter VI-A into the provisions of the parent Act in order to provide for the levy, assessment and recovery of a development Charge. Sub-section (1) of section 124-A enacts the levy of a development Charge in the following terms :

"124-A (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act. the Planning Authority or the development Authority (hereinafter in this Chapter collectively referred to as "the Authority"), shall levy within the area of its jurisdiction development charge on the institution of use or change of use of any land or building, or development of any land or building, for which permission is required under this Act, at the rates specified by or under the provisions of this Chapter : provided that, where land appurtenant to a building is used for any purpose independent of the building, development charge may be levied separately for the building and the land. "

( 2 ) BY virtue of the provisions of sub-section (2) the Deve


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top