SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 747

S.T.KHARCHE
Kashinath Ramkrishna Chopade – Appellant
Versus
Purushottam Tulshiram Tekade – Respondent


Judgment

S. T. KHARCHE, J.

( 1 ) INVOKING the jurisdiction of this Court under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, this appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and decree dated 18-7-1989 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in Regular Civil Appeal No. 92 of 1985, whereby the appeal came to be dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 18-12-1984 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Jr. Dn. , in Regular Civil Suit No. 31 of 1981 has been confirmed and it was declared that the plaintiffs are the owners of the suit site which is described by letters A-3, A-4, A-12, A-2 and A-3 in the suit map Ex. 32. The defendants were also directed to deliver the vacant possession of the suit site described by letters A-3, A-4, A-12, A-2 and A-3 in the suit map Ex. 32 after removing the construction from it with further direction that if the defendant fails to remove his construction over the above described suit site, the plaintiffs would be entitled to get it removed at their own costs.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts are required to be stated as under : the plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration that the suit site is owned by them and the defendants be restrained from interfering















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top