SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 96

S.T.KHARCHE
Deepak Kanhaiyalal Sarvaiya – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) INVOKING the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of criminal Procedure, the petitioner seeks the relief of quashing the order dated 25-02-2002 passed below Ex. 71 by the learned 3rd additional Sessions Judge, Akola, in Sessions trial No. 8/2002, whereby the application filed by the prosecution for recalling the witnesses nalini (P. W. 3) and Investigating Officer phundkar (P. W. 13) examined by the prosecution, was allowed.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts are as under : the petitioner/accused is facing trial for the offences punishable under Sections 328, 307, 302 and 392 of Indian Penal Code before the learned Sessions Judge. The evidence of nalini (P. W. 3) was recorded on 19-06-2001 and the evidence of P. S. I. Phundkar was recorded on 04-07-2001. The prosecution has closed its case by filing pursis dated 25-10-2001. The statement of accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was recorded on 28-12-2001. Arguments were heard between 04-01-2002 to 08-01-2002. Thereafter the prosecution had filed an application under Section 311 of the Code of criminal Procedure on 11-01-2002 vide Ex. 71, which was allowed and the aforesaid two witnesses have












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top