SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 43

ANOOP V.MOHTA, S.S.PARKAR
Kashiram Jairam Pawar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

ANOOP V. MOHTA,j.

( 1 ) 1. Appellant no. 1 father and appellant no. 2 mother, were charged, tried and convicted for the murder of their daughter Raijabai (the deceased ). Therefore, present common appeal against the judgment and order of conviction

( 2 ) ON the basis of an anonymous letter and a letter dated 1/9/1992, by P. W. 11 hiraman Chavan, and in pursuance to the letter dated 4-9-1992 of the Judicial Magistrate F. C. , satana received on 25-9-1992, by the Police station Jaikheda, the investigation was set in motion. As per the prosecution the deceased, pregnant of 5 months, was missing since 28/7/1992. It is alleged that the appellants/accused killed the deceased by administering poison and buried the dead body in the field. On investigation a skeleton was exhumed from the land on 1/10/1992, in presence of an Executive magistrate and a Doctor. The post-mortem of the skeleton was performed by the doctor and a panchanama was prepared. The statements of the witnesses were recorded. On 1/10/1992 accidental death, was registered. However, on 9/10/1992 P. S. I. Gunjal, P. W. 1, lodged the complaint to Jaikheda Police Station and accordingly offence was registered against th















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top