SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 421

A.M.KHANWILKAR
BALKRISHNA DHONDU RAUL – Appellant
Versus
MANIK MOTIRAM JAGTAP – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) HEARD Counsel for the parties. This application takes exception to the order passed by the Sessions Court, Raigad at Alibag, dated 8th February, 2005, as well as the order passed by the J. M. F. C. , Mahad at Mahad, dated 9th february, 2005. The background in which the aforesaid orders came to be passed is as follows.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 has been named as accused in an offence registered with Mahad Police Station punishable under sections 147. 148, 307, 323, 504, 437, 452, 506 of the Indian Penal Code; and section 3 read with section 25 of the arms Act. Respondent No. 1 had, in the first place, approached the Sessions court by way of anticipatory bail application, which was, however, rejected. Another unsuccessful attempt of anticipatory bail was made before this Court by respondent No. 1. This Court by order dated 3rd February, 2005 disposed of the anticipatory bail application preferred by the respondent No. 1 granting limited protection to respondent No. 1 to surrender before the appropriate Court and prefer regular bail application, if so advised, on or before 9th February, 2005. In view of the liberty granted by this Court, respondent No. 1 surrendered before








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top