SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Q.M.Chaudhary and another
Versus
Homestead Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. and others
Decided On:

Headnote:Section 94 (3) (a) - Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Sections 149, 141, 4 Explanation 2 and Order 9 - Maharashtra Co - operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 58 - Ex parte award - Co - operative Court was a Court of civil jurisdiction and a dispute before the Co - operative Court was a dispute of civil nature - It covers the proceedings under Order 9 of C. P. C. which refers to the application for setting aside the ex parte decree - Lacuna in the Act and Rules Procedure laid down in the C. P. C. to be followed - Held, application before the trial Court for setting aside ex parte order vacating the Injunction granted earlier was maintainable and cannot be said to be not maintainable.

       Rule 58

       See Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960-Section 94 (3) (a) Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Sections 149, 141, 4, Explanation and 2 and order 9.

       For Citation : 1988 CTJ 261

Q. M. Chaudhary and another VS Homestead Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. and others
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top