SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Genpat Mahadeo Virkud
Versus
Chintaman Mahadeo Virkud
Decided On:

Headnote:Section 91- Dispute filed jointly- Maintainability of-Principle regarding -Prayer for possession, injunction, etc-Cause of action-Whether C. P. C. does not govern the proceedings under the Act-Promissory estoppel-Withdrawal of earlier suit filed-Question of effect on initial dispute-Held, dispute maintainable under Section 91 of the Act-Civil Procedure Code, 1908-Order XXIII, Rule 1 (5).

       For Citation : 1989 CTJ 80

Genpat Mahadeo Virkud VS Chintaman Mahadeo Virkud
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top