SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
State of Maharashtra
Versus
Chandrakant Vasudeo Somshetti
Decided On:

Headnote:MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1967 (AS AMENDED BY ACT 18 of 1915).

       Section 34-Land Acquisition Act-Section 35 (2) and Constitution of India-Article 227-Petitions under-Maintainability of-Reference made to District Court about quantum of compensation on acquisition of laud-Award passed under Section 34 (II).

       Held-Such an award becomes decree and then it would be appealable. Appeal would be to High Court and further to Supreme Court. Petition under Article 227 to challenge decision of Court deciding reference about quantum of compensation will not be maintainable.

       For Citation : 1991 Mah LJ 392 : AIR 1991 Bom 245

State of Maharashtra VS Chandrakant Vasudeo Somshetti
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top