SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Ratansi Mulji
Versus
Vinod Ratilal Gandhi and another
Decided On:

Headnote:Sections 3 (2) 7-Trade Merchandise Marks Act (43 of 1958) Sections 711, 79, 44 and 2 (w)-Management of or Textile Undertaking taken over by National Textile Corporations Prosecution by Corporation against accused/owner of undertaking for infringement of trade marks.

       Held-Accused are themselves registered proprietor of trade marks.

       They were divested of general control etc. of the undertaking taking over by corporation and not of their rights as registered proprietors of trade marks. Prosecution not maintainable.

       For Citation : 1991 Cr LJ 2766 (Bom)

Ratansi Mulji VS Vinod Ratilal Gandhi and another
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top