SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Jose Sebastian Kenedy Applinario Alomao
Versus
Union of India
Decided On:

Headnote:Section 3 (1)-Detention under-Legality of.

       Documents seized styled as incriminating documents by detaining authority itself-Same not placed before detaining authority-Said documents vital constituting basic material for subjective satisfaction-In absence of said incriminating documents, there was non-application of mind on part of detaining authority-Held-Detention stood vitiated-Impugned order of detention liable to be quashed.

       For Citation : (1992) I Crimes 752 (Bom) (DB)

Jose Sebastian Kenedy Applinario Alomao VS Union of India
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top