SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Prakash Supudu Chandhary
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Decided On:

Headnote:Section 56 (1) - "Witnesses are not willing to come forward"-Expression of-Meaning thereof-Every witness should be unwilling to come forward - Power-Can be exercised-Even if some witnesses willing to come forward.

       Section 56 (1) (b)-Exercise of Powers under-Witness should be unwilling to come forward to give evidence-If witness willing to come forward-Person concerned be dealt with under provisions of Indian Penal Code-Bombay Police Act-Recourse of-Not necessary.

       Sections 59 and 56 (1) (b)-Externment proceeding-Person against whom instituted-Entitled to know reason of-Notice-If does not say that witnesses are unwilling to come forward to depose against him-Externment order without jurisdiction-Hence, set aside.

       For Citation : 1993 Mah LJ 816

Prakash Supudu Chandhary VS State of Maharashtra
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top