SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Shastri Sales Corpn.
Versus
I.T.O
Decided On:

Headnote:Sections 271 (c), 276(c), 271 and 278, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482-Proceedings-Quashlng of-Penalty proceeding. Initiated under provisions of I.T. Act for offence of income concealment-During pendency of criminal complaint filed basing same facts-Final authority under I.T. Act quashing penalty orders-Held; that criminal proceedings after quashing of penalty orders not justified, hence, accused entitled to be discharged.

       Section 482-See Income Tax Act, 1961-Sections 271(1)(c), 276(c), 271 and 278.

       For Citation : 1996 Cr LJ 449

Shastri Sales Corpn. VS I. T. O
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top