SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Rubyana alias Smita Sanjib Bali
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Decided On:

Headnote:Sections 20 and 21-Arms Act, 1959-Section 25 r/w Section 7"Possession"-Must be conscious and intelligent.

       Possession implies dominion and consciousness in the mind of the person having dominion over an object that he has it and that he can exercise it. Possession most be conscious and intelligent possession and not merely the physical of the accused in proximity or even in close proximity to the object.

       For Citation : 1996(1) All MR 1 at p.4

Rubyana alias Smita Sanjib Bali VS State of Maharashtra
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top