SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Haridas, s/o Ajab Shinde
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Decided On:

Headnote:SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989

       Section 3(1)(x)-Charge of abusing by four persons by her caste to a woman-Which particular accused uttered the offending word not specified. Charge is vague.

       Section 509-Accused charged of abusing Scheduled Caste woman by caste and also under Section 509-Relatlons between the parties strained-Belated F J.R. and varying versions by witnesses charge vague-Benefit of doubt given to the accused.

       For Citation : 1996(4) All MR 336 (Bom)

Haridas, s/o Ajab Shinde VS State of Maharashtra
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top