SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Bombay High Court
Ramkrishan
Versus
Rajendra
Decided On:

Headnote:Sections 197 and 482-Bombay Police Act, 1951, Section 161-Necesslty of prior sanction-Complainants alleging wrongful apprehending, assaulting by police officers-Section 161 Bombay Police Act requires filing of such case within six months, not justified for Issue of process without prior sanction by Government under 197, Cr PC.-There is no explanation in the complaint filed by the first respondent before the Magistrate for the delay in filing a complaint under Section 161 of the Bombay Police Act which fix a time limit i.e. maximum limit of six months for filing criminal complaints. In the absence of a convincing explanation for the delay in filing the complaint particularly a prosecution has already launched against the first respondent is a very relevant fact or which cannot be ignored in deciding this case. In these circumstances it was held that the objection raised by the petitioner in the present petition that the complaint filed against the petitioner cannot be proceeded without prior sanction under Section 197 of the Cr PC is sustainable.

       For Citation 1997 Bom Cr (Cri) 461

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top