Bombay High Court
Vijay Kumar Maniklal Bang
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Decided On:

Headnote:Section 9-A read with Schedule IV Item lo-Appellant an employee as foreman In composing department instalment of photo composing machine in place of hand composing-Introduction of new technique of rationalisation -standardrisation Improvement of plant or technique-Notice not served under Section 9-A of I.D. Act-Transfer of service which Is not transferable stay granted by Industrial Court vacated-Stay granted by this Court favoured appellant by District Court retrenchment by respondent-Validity-Held, respondent indulged into Unfair Labour Practice under item l(a)(b)(d)(f) of Schedule IV of MRTU and honoured in that view of the matter it will have to be held that the Instant writ petition is not maintainable.

       For Citation 1997 (1) Mah LJ 637