Bombay High Court
Shanker Gopal Patil
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Decided On:
If the evidence of the prosecution viz., PW No.2 N alone is considered, which gets corroboration from the evidence discussed above, PW No.2 N has specifically given the names of five accused who were the assailants of his brother R and himself. According to him all of them were armed with weapons and all of them were assaulted R and himself, simultaneously in the course of same transaction and thereafter the assailants ran away from the spot. Even PW No. 3 T supports N in this regard. Further injuries on the persons of R proved that he had bullet injury as well as unlawful assembly and they came at the spot with common object of killing R and also N because N was also shot at, though he survived from the attack by guns. The so called absence of evidence of the accused surrounding Ramdas, as is observed by the trial Court, has to be inferred from the attack by five or more persons. Finding of trial Court set aside.
For Citation : 2000 (5) Born CR 360
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.