SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1550

D.G.DESHPANDE, V.M.KANADE
Mushtaq Abdul Majeed Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

V. M. KANADE, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANT is the original accused. By this appeal the appellant/ accused challenges the judgment and order passed by the Court of Sessions for Greater bombay in Sessions Case No. 766 of 1997. By the said judgment and order dated 22nd september, 1998 the Sessions Judge has convicted the appellant for an offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian penal Code and sentenced him to suffer R. I. for life and further imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, the accused was to further undergo R. I. for three months. The appellant/accused was further found guilty for the offence punishable under sections 394 and 449 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer R. I. for 5 years on both the counts and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo sentence of one month.

( 2 ) BEING aggrieved by the said judgment and order, the appellant has preferred this appeal. The brief facts, which are relevant for the purpose of this appeal, are as under :- the case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 15th March, 1997 the accused committed a murder of Kaluram Gumaji Jain who was sleeping in the sh











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top