SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1603

F.I.REBELLO, R.S.DALVI
BANKIMCHANDRA MAKANBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Judgment

F. I. REBELLO, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Heard forthwith.

( 2 ) THE petitioner claims to belong to Dhodia tribe which is recognized as a scheduled tribe pursuant to issuance of the Presidential Notification under Article 342 (1) of the Constitution of India both in the State of Gujarat as also in the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners father was born on 2-6-1953 at village Pitha, taluka Chikhali, District Valsad now in State of Gujarat. The petitioners father was employed with the Western Railway since 23-1-1976. The petitioner was born on 15-8-1979 at village Pitha, Valsad in the State of Gujarat. Petitioners and his fathers caste is shown as "hindu Dhodia". It is the case of the petitioner that he was granted certificate of domicile on 4-2-1997 by the Additional Chief metropolitan Magistrate, 24th Court, Borivali, Mumbai setting out that the petitioner is a domicile of State of Maharashtra. The petitioner sought admission to the Engineering degree course and as such he moved respondent No. 2 which is the Tribe scrutiny committee for validating his tribe certificate. The committee, however, was pleased to invalidate the certificate holding that the petitioner is a migrant from the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top