SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1594

N.A.BRITTO
Mahesh Mehta – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS revision if filed by the accused in C. C. No. 101/n/2000/c against his conviction and sentence imposed upon him under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act, for short), by judgment / Order dated 18-6-2003 as confirmed by the learned 1st additional Sessions Judge, Margao by his Judgment / Order dated 10-9-2004.

( 2 ) THE case of the Complainant, in brief, is that the Complainant had invested money with the accused and in payment thereof the accused had issued two cheques both dated 30-9-1999, one bearing No. 062165 for Rs. 12,000/- and the other bearing No. 062168 for Rs. 4,00,000/-, both drawn on Global trust Bank Ltd. , Margao but when the Complainant presented the said cheques for encashment through her Bankers the same were dishonoured as the accused did not have sufficient funds in his said account and the said Bank had issued two different memos to the Complainant informing the complainant that the cheques were dishonoured for the following reasons: "refer to drawer"

( 3 ) THE Complainant issued a legal notice dated 10-1-2000 by registered post A. D. and the same was returned undelivered as the accused despite intimation by postal authorities decli

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top