SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1701

ANOOP V.MOHTA
Purshottam Narayan Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Mamati Jayram Ambonkar – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE are three appeals filed against the common order dated 31/3/1987, passed by the Motor Accident claim Tribunal ( Claim Tribunal), whereby, the appellant-Insurance Company, in first appeal No. 587 and 588 of 1990 i. e. original opponent No. 3 and the appellant in First appeal No. 1063/1987, original opponent NO. 2-owner of the vehicle, have been directed to pay an amount of Rs. 64,800/- together with interest at 12 % p. a. from the date of petition till payment of the amount and proportionate cost of the petition. Opponent No. 2 have been directed to pay an amount of rs. 14,800 and opponent No. 3 to pay an amount of Rs. 50,000/- with interest on the respective amounts.

( 2 ) THE learned Counsel appearing for the appellant in First Appeal No. 1063/1987-opponent NO. 2, basically contended, that in view of the Supreme Courts judgment in ( G. Govindan V. New India Assurance Co. Ltd and others) (AIR 1999 S. C. 1398) and (Rikhi Ram and another v. Smt. Sukhrania and others ) (AIR 2003 S. C. 1446) based on the provisions of sections 94, 95 and 103a of motor Vehicles Act (4 of 1939), the Apex Court has made it very clear that so far as, the liability of Insurance company is concer









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top