SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1757

ANOOP V.MOHTA
Sanjay Harishchandra Vanarase – Appellant
Versus
Maratha Prakashan Pvt. Ltd – Respondent


( 1 ) ALL these three first appeals as arising out of a common judgment and decree passed in Short Causes Suit no. 3565 o1965 by the Judge, City Civil Court, bombay, whereby a suit filed by the original plaintiff/appellant in First Appeal No. 328 of 2003 and first Appeal No. 409 of 1987 and the respondent in First Appeal No. 408 of 1987 was dismissed. The First Appeal No. 408 of 1987 has been preferred by original defendant/ obstructionist No. 2 against the original plaintiff in Short Cause Suit Nos. 1068 of 1966 and 1089 of 1966 in the City Civil Court at Bombay. One Maratha Prakashan Pvt. Ltd. filed suit against Sanjay Harishchandra Vanarase, who is plaintiff No. 2 in Short Cause Suit No. 3565 of 1965. It be noted here the respondents in first Appeal No. 408 of 1987 were the plaintiffs in Short Causes Suit Nos. 1088 of 1996 and 1089 of 1966. The facts and circumstances and parties are inter linked and connected in all these three suits and as consented, all the three appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

( 2 ) THE common dates and events in all these three proceedings are as under : the suit property is Shop No. 7 situated at House No. 21/33, Mughbhat L













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top