SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1709

D.S.ZOTING, K.J.ROHEE
MANOHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Judgment

K. J. ROHEE, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant has challenged his conviction for the offences punishable under sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of imprisonment for life, fine of Rs. 1000/- and Rigorous Imprisonment for one year, fine of Rs. 500/- respectively under each section.

( 2 ) THE appellant was prosecuted for the offences punishable under sections 498-A, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the marriage of the appellant had taken place about 10 years before the incident with Nalu, the daughter of PW 1 Govinda s/o Fakiraji Hatwar, resident of Umarga-Bazar, Tah. Karanja, District - Washim. After marriage Nalu cohabited with the appellant at Anjangaon-Bari, District - Amravati. Out of the said wedlock the couple was blessed with a daughter, aged about 9 years and a son, aged about 5 years. According to the prosecution Nalu was treated properly by the appellant for about two years in the beginning. Thereafter the appellant started illtreating her. The appellant was addicted to liquor. The appellant used to demand money from her father. On the last occasion i. e. about eight days before the incident the appel
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top