2005 Supreme(Bom) 1652
D.G.DESHPANDE, V.M.KANADE
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Abu Salem Abdul Kayyum Ansari – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Mr. Borulkar, the learned Public Prosecutor for the petitioner/ state and Mr. Siddiqui, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent/accused. The Designated Court has passed an order on 29th November 2005. It is a short order. We are reproducing the same as under :-"public Prosecutor Mrs. Rohini Salian present. Accused produced from custody. A. C. P. Dhawale present. Advocate Sarogi with adv. Siddiqui for accused present. Accused stated that he has no complaint about eatable provided by police, no complaint about place where he put for interrogation as I found that accused wanted to tell me something in absence of police and advocate. Accused was produced before me. In my chamber accused made grievance that so many officers used to interrogate him because of which some time he used to became restless. Considering the grievance of the accused Investigating Officer is directed that he himself and/or P. I. Shri Deshmukh should interrogate the accused and no other officer should not interrogate the accused. "
( 2 ) THE present writ petition is only directed against the following part of the order. "considering the grievance of the accused Investigating officer is directe
Click Here to Read the rest of this document