SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1717

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
RAMCHANDRA KESHAVRAO DEO – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER, SCHOOL TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR – Respondent


( 1 ) BY this writ petition under Article 226 of constitution of India, the petitioner an ex-employee in the employment of respondents No. 2 and 3 has challenged the Government Resolution dated 9-9-1988 along with the orders dated 5-10-1991, 10-1-1992 of his employer management and 24-2-1994 of School Tribunal. By the Government Resolution mentioned above, the management of Private Schools have been empowered to order compulsory retirement of their employees in accordance with the procedure prescribed thereunder. On 5-10-1991, in exercise of that power, respondents No. 2 and 3 ordered compulsory retirement of present petitioner with effect from 10-1-1992. By order dated 10-1-1992, the petitioner has been relieved accordingly. The petitioner challenged said order in an appeal under section 9 of Maharashtra employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, (hereinafter referred to as the Act or MEPS Act), before respondent No. 1 - school Tribunal and said Tribunal, by its judgment dated 24-2-1994 dismissed his appeal.

( 2 ) THE petitioner joined the services on 4-7-1967 as Assistant Teacher and at that time he was graduate with B. Sc. Degree. He obtained B. E











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top