SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Bom) 1798

NISHITA MHATRE
GIRISH J. BOBADE – Appellant
Versus
AJAY THAKUR – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS petition is filed under section 11 of the guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The petitioner is seeking guardianship of his minor daughters who are in the custody of their mother, the petitioners wife. The question which has arisen in this petition is whether such petition is maintainable before this Court in view of the provisions of the Family Courts Act, 1984 and the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Romila Jaidev Shroff vs. Jaidev Rajnikant Shroff, 2000 (3) Mh. LJ. (FB) 468 = II (2000) DMC 600 (FB ).

( 2 ) SINCE this is an important question of law which would affect several matters, I requested the learned Advocate General to address the Court. He has brought to my notice various provisions of law which have enabled me to deliver this judgment. Ms. Swati Deshpande, who was appointed as amicus curiae has also rendered able assistance in the matter. I am grateful to both the learned advocate General as well as Ms. Swati Deshpande for their valuable assistance in the matter.

( 3 ) THE petitioner has sought guardianship of the person and property of his minor daughters Divya and Priya. Respondent No. 1 to the Petition is a family friend of the petitione









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top