SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 368

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
NITIN s/o MANGA SHIRSAT
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Decided on,MARCH 10, 2006

Headnote:Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 20 and 21 Election Chairman of Standing Committee Fresh Standing Committee required to be appointed each year on first day of same month in which first meeting held Notice and meeting to appoint Chairman after completion of said month Validity of Notice convening meeting for election of Chairman one month after expiry of 30 days improper. So far as election of the Chairman of the new Standing Committee every year, the starting point is the date of retirement of half of the members specified in sub-section (3) of that Section. Consequently, the second clause is required to be read with sub-section (3) of Section 20. On reference to the said provision, it is evident that the legislation in its wisdom has not left the date of retirement at the option of the member of the Standing Committee. Half of the members of the Standing Committee, at the end of first year, by procedure of drawing lots and at the end of succeeding years, the senior half members of the Standing Committee stand retired on the first day of the month in which the first meeting of the Corporation as mentioned in subsection (2) of Section 20 was held. Thus, even if the first meeting of the Corporation for election of first Standing Committee was held after expiry of major portion of the calender month, that will not enable the first Standing Committee to continue to be Standing Committee exactly for a period of one year and up to the date of the same calender month of the succeeding year on which they were elected immediately after general elections. If they are elected on the first day of the calender month, the tenure of the members of the first Standing Committee may be exactly 365 days. But if they are elected in the general body meeting of the Corporation held on later date of the month, the life of the first Standing Committee shall stand curtailed to that extent from exact period of one year. If they are elected on the last day of the ca lender month, their tenure practically would be only 11 months. By subsection (3) of the Section 20, legislation has left no option to the members of the Standing Committee and they retire on the first day of the month of the succeeding year in which they were elected at the first meeting of the Corporation under Section 20(2). In the matter at hands, new complexion of the Standing Committee was and is due on every 1st December. Such an interpretation is strongly supported by sub-section (5) of Section 20, which casts on obligation on the Corporation to appoint fresh members in the month preceding the date of retirement specified in sub-section (3) of Section 20. Thu s, in the case of subject Corporation, the Constitution of the Standing Committee was to change on 1st December of every succeeding year and it was the responsibility of the Corporation to elect the half members of the Standing Committee to be substituted in place of members retiring on 1st December in the month of November itself.

       The starting point for computation of period of limitation of 30 days during which the Standing Committee can elect its Chairman is first day of the same calender month, in which first Standing Committee was elected after general elections, the same i 2nd of December in the matter at hands and, therefore, period of 30 days expired on 31st December, 2005 by taking 2nd December as day one for the purpose of computation, since the retirement of half the members of the Standing Committee was to take effect on 1st December, 2005. The notice dated 2nd January, 2006 convening a meeting for election of Chairman of the Standing Committee on 10th January, 2006 is, therefore, violative of Section 21 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and is required to be struck down.

       Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 20 and 21 Computation of limitation period of 30 days for Election of Chairman. Starting point of computation of limitation period of 30 days during which Standing Committee can elect its Chairman is first day of same calendar month in which first Standing Committee was elected.

       Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Section 20 and 21 Election of the chairman of the new standing committee every year Starting point for computation of period of limitation of 30 days is first day of the same calender month, in which first standing committee was elected after general elections. So far as election of the Chairman of the new Standing Committee every year, the starting point is the date of retirement of half of the members specified in sub-section (3) of Section 20 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act. The senior half members of the Standing Committee stand retired on the first day of the month in which the first meeting of the Corporation, as mentioned in sub-section (2) of Section 20, was held. Thus, even if the first meeting of the Corporation for election of first Standing Committee was held after expiry of major portion of the calendar month, that will not enable the first Standing Committee to continue to be Standing Committee exactly for a period of one year and upto the date of the same calendar month of the succeeding year on which they were elected immediately after general elections. If they are elected on the first day of the calendar month, the tenure of the members of the first Standing Committee may be exactly 365 days. But if they are elected in the general body meeting of the Corporation held on later date of the month, the life of the first Standing Committee shall stand curtailed to that extent from exact period of one year. If they are elected on the last day of the calendar month, their tenure practically would be only 11 months. By sub-section (3) of Section 20, legislation has left no option to the members of the Standing Committee and they retire on the first day of the month of the succeeding year in which they were elected at the first meeting of the Corporation under Section 20(2). New complexion of the Standing Committee was and is due on every 1st December. Such an interpretation is strongly supported by sub-section (5) of Section 20 which casts an obligation on the Corporation to appoint fresh members in the month preceding the date of retirement specified in sub-section (3) of Section 20. Thus, in the case of subject Corporation, the constitution of the Standing Committee was to change on 1st December of every succeeding year and it was the responsibility of the Corporation to elect the half members of the Standing Committee to be substituted in place of members retiring on 1st December in the month of November itself. Consequently the Standing Committee ought to have held a meeting for the purpose and elected its chairman on 31st December, 2005 itself. The notice dated 2nd January, 2006 convening a meeting for election of chairman of the Standing Committee on 10th January, 2006 is, therefore violative of Section 21 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and is required to be struck down.

Judgment

N. V. DABHOLKAR, J.

( 1 ) BOTH writ petitions under Article 226 of the constitution of India are clubbed together since common challenge and common question of law is raised by the two petitions. All three petitioners (one in Writ petition No. 74/2006 and two in Writ Petition No. 540/2006) are elected councillors of the Municipal Corporation of Dhule. The petitioner in Writ petition No. 74/2006, in addition; was also elected as member of the Standing committee of the said Corporation for two years. He along with 7 others retired as members of the Standing Committee on due completion of their tenure.

( 2 ) THE factual matrix in both the writ petitions is common and undisputed, which can be narrated in brief as follows : general elections of Dhule Municipal Corporation were held on 8th december, 2003. Total 67 Councillors were elected and 5 were co-opted. Thus, the strength of Municipal Corporation is 72. On 30-12-2003, in the first General body Meeting of the Corporation, Mayor was elected, so also, 16 members of the standing Committee were elected. On expiry of one year, 8 members of the standing Committee, drawn by following procedure of lots, retired on 1st december, 2004 and were duly substituted by new 8 members. Similarly, on 1st december, 2005, senior 8 members of the then Standing Committee retired and in their places, 8 new members were added to the Standing Committee by election held on 31st December, 2005. The Municipal Secretary of Dhule Municipal Corporation issued a notice dated 2nd January, 2006, convening a meeting of the Standing Committee on 10th January, 2006, for the purpose of election of Chairman of the Standing committee. This notice and consequent meeting is under challenge as illegal being contrary to the provisions of section 21 of the Bombay Provincial municipal Corporation Act, 1949 (henceforth referred to as "the said Act" for the sake of brevity ).

( 3 ) HEARD Shri S. S. Chaudhary, Advocate, and Senior Counsel, Shri V. J. Dixit, for petitioners in respective writ petitions; Government Pleader Shri E. P. Sawant, for respondent No. 1/state in Writ Petition No. 74/2006 and Senior counsel Shri P. M. Shah, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Assistant Government pleader, Shri K. J. Ghute Patil for State/respondent No. 3 in Writ Petition No. 540/2006, has practically adopted the arguments advanced by Senior Counsel, shri P. M. Shah, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in Writ Petition No. 74/2006 and respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in Writ Petition No. 540/2006. Respondent Nos. 4 to 19 in both the writ petitions are present members of the Standing Committee. Respondent Nos. 4, 10 to 15 are represented by Advocate Mrs. M. L. Sangit. By mutual consent of the Lawyers, rule was made returnable forthwith and matter was heard for final disposal.

( 4 ) IN order to appreciate the submissions advanced by the two sides, it is desirable to refer to and for the purpose to reproduce portion of relevant provisions for ready reference. We are mainly concerned with section 20 and section 21 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949, and we reproduce herein below the relevant portions :"section 20. Constitution of Standing Committee.- (1) The Standing committee shall consist of sixteen councillors. (2) The Corporation shall at its first meeting after general elections appoint sixteen persons out of its own body to be members of the standing Committee. (3) One-half of the members of the Standing Committee shall retire every succeeding year at noon on the first day of the month in which the first meeting of the Corporation mentioned in sub-section (2) was held : provided that. . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) The members who shall retire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provided that. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) The Corporation shall at its meeting held in the month preceding the date of retirement specified in sub-section (3) appoint fresh members of the Standing Committee to fill the offices of those who are due to ret








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top