V. R. KINGAONKAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner impugns electricity Bills dated 24th November, 2000 and 18th July, 2001 and action of respondent No. 1 causing disconnection of electricity supply.

( 2 ) ONE deceased Smt. Padma Kirpalani was consumer of respondent No. 1 - Maharashtra State Electricity Board. The electricity supply was being provided to her residential premises through Meter No. 9100020034. She demised on 15th april, 1980 and was survived by son Prakash Kirpalani who continued to use the residential premises. He was a divorcee and demised as such on 29th April, 2000. He is said to have bequeathed the properties in favour of his sister - petitioner - smt. Veena Bajaj.

( 3 ) THE petitioner received a supplementary Bill dated 24th November, 2000 showing dues of Rs. 75,142. 78 p. for a period of 50 months prior. She further received an Electricity Bill dated 18th July, 2001 purporting to claim arrears of huge amount towards electricity consumption charges. Since there were no details shown in the Electricity Bills, she made an enquiry with respondent No. 1 and was furnished copy of Personal Ledger Account. The petitioner alleges that both the demand bills are incorrect