SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 344

ARUN KUMAR, G.P.MATHUR
RAJBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) THIS appeal, by special leave, has been preferred by the complainant (the first informant) against the judgment and ordef dated 9-7-2004 of the Allahabad high Court by which the charges framed against Akhilesh Chauhan (respondent 2) were set aside.

( 3 ) THE appellant Rajbir Singh lodged an FIR at 5. 10 p. m. on 29-9-2003 at ps New Agra, alleging that a day before, some brickbats were thrown in the compound of his brothers house from the house of his neighbour Ramraj rathore. On account of this incident, exchange of hot words took place between his father Hoti Lal and accused Ramraj Rathore, but the matter was pacified due to intervention of some persons of the locality. At about 4. 00 p. m. on 29-9-2003 ramraj Rathore and his relations Geetendra Singh and Prem Narain who were armed with firearms came near the shop of the complainant where his father was standing and all of them exhorted that Hoti Lal should be killed. Ramraj Rathore started firing towards Hoti Lal who after receiving the injuries fell down. Pooja balmiki, a girl belonging to the Scheduled Caste community, who had come to purchase some articles from the shop, also sustained firearm injuri









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top