SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 736

R.M.LODHA, J.P.DEVADHAR
Commissioner of Customs (Import) – Appellant
Versus
Wockhardt Hospital and Heart institute – Respondent


Judgment

J. P. DEVADHAR, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals are filed by the revenue under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. Since the issue involved in these appeals are common, both these appeals are heard together and disposed of by this common Judgment.

( 2 ) THESE appeals are filed against the orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate tribunal, West Zonal Branch at Mumbai (the Tribunal for short) on 13/2/04 and 13/8/04 respectively. The question before the Tribunal was, where the imported goods cleared without payment of duty under a conditional exemption notification are confiscated with an option to pay fine in lieu of confiscation and if the option is not exercised by the owner, whether the revenue is entitled to recover customs duty payable on such goods ? The Tribunal held that on confiscation, the goods vest in the government and the liability to pay duty under section 125 (2) of the Customs Act, 1962 would arise only if the owner opts to redeem the goods by paying the redemption fine. As the owners in these two cases have not opted to redeem the goods, the tribunal held that the customs duty is not payable. Challenging the aforesaid orders, the revenue
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top