SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 653

S.U.KAMDAR
Vijay Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Gopinath Mahade Koli – Respondent


( 1 ) IN a suit being Suit No. 1780 of 1993 a chamber summons was taken out by one Madhu Lakhma kakade inter alia seeking relief that the applicant should be added as a party defendant to the suit and the plaintiffs should be directed to serve upon him the suit proceedings. In view of the fact that one of the documents which were used in support of the application being prima facie found to be fabricated document, I directed by my order dated 28. 2. 2005 the crime Investigation Department (CID) to conduct an investigation about the genuineness of the documents annexed as Annexure "i" to the said order. It was further directed that the CID should find out whether any such school exists and whether it had a primary section at the relevant time in the year 1967 and whether the applicant Madhu Lakhma Kakade was a student of such a school. I further directed that the matter be placed on board on 15. 3. 2005. Thereafter I directed the Chamber Summons to be placed for hearing on 21. 3. 2005. On 21. 3. 2005 after hearing the parties and on perusal of the report filed by the CID. I found that the document is a fraudulent document and accordingly I dismissed the chamber Summons with compensa





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top