( 1 ) IN a suit being Suit No. 1780 of 1993 a chamber summons was taken out by one Madhu Lakhma kakade inter alia seeking relief that the applicant should be added as a party defendant to the suit and the plaintiffs should be directed to serve upon him the suit proceedings. In view of the fact that one of the documents which were used in support of the application being prima facie found to be fabricated document, I directed by my order dated 28. 2. 2005 the crime Investigation Department (CID) to conduct an investigation about the genuineness of the documents annexed as Annexure "i" to the said order. It was further directed that the CID should find out whether any such school exists and whether it had a primary section at the relevant time in the year 1967 and whether the applicant Madhu Lakhma Kakade was a student of such a school. I further directed that the matter be placed on board on 15. 3. 2005. Thereafter I directed the Chamber Summons to be placed for hearing on 21. 3. 2005. On 21. 3. 2005 after hearing the parties and on perusal of the report filed by the CID. I found that the document is a fraudulent document and accordingly I dismissed the chamber Summons with compensatory cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid by the applicant to all the three claimants in the equal share of Rs. 3,300/- each. I further directed issuance of a notice for perjury and contempt and made returnable on 12. 4. 2005. Pursuant to the said show cause notice, an affidavit was filed by Mahadu Lakhma Kakade in which he furnished his explanation that he is illiterate and he further alleged that Mohankumar K. Advocate and one Anna P. Construction obtained the said school leaving certificate and made him file with his affidavit and he does not even know the contents of his affidavit which was filed with the chamber summons. I thereafter issued a notice of contempt and perjury against those two persons namely, Advocate Mohankumar K. and Anna P. Construction also. Thereafter on the report being examined I found that various persons are involved in obtaining the said fraudulent certificate and using the same in court proceedings. On the basis of the CID report and the role each party has performed in obtaining the said fraudulent certificate and using the same in Court, I also directed issuance of show cause notice to various persons. In para 3 of my order dated 2. 5. 2005, I also recorded another disturbing feature that outside the Court room there was a scuffle between two advocates being Mr. Mohankumar K and I. R. Castellino being the erstwhile advocate of Madhu lakhma Kakad and a new advocate who appeared pursuant to the show cause notice. I had directed the police to take necessary steps in the matter. Thus, by my order dated 2. 5. 2005 I issued a contempt notice against Madhu Lakhma Kakad as well as Mr. Narsimhan, Sole Proprietor of Annapi Constructions and Mohankumar K. Advocate. Thereafter the CID conducted further investigation and ultimately they filed a report which was taken on record by an order dated 25. 7. 2005. On receipt of the report, I found that various other persons are also involved in the said conspiracy in obtaining fraudulent document and using the same in Court proceedings. The names which appeared in the report were Ramchandra Shankar kurle, Shankar Kakad Kure, Manojkumr Shyam Devadiga, b. R. Rai and Anant Balu Pawase. Accordingly, by my order dated 7. 10. 2005, I also directed the office to issue show cause notice to the aforesaid persons. I have perused the CID report. In the CID report it has been clearly established that the various persons are involved in obtaining the said fraudulent certificate and using the same in Court proceedings with a view to claim right,title and interest in the suit property. The affidavits which have been filed by the various parties indicate the following picture.

( 2 ) MAHADU Lakhma Kakade being the applicant has a brother called Shankar Kakad Kure. These two gentlemen wanted to levy a claim in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document