SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 679

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, KSHITIJ R.VYAS
Sudhir Narayan Sawant – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

( 1 ) RULE, returnable forthwith. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents waive service. By consent taken up for hearing and final disposal.

( 2 ) THE Petitioner is in the employment of the Fourth respondent as a lecturer and has been allotted to work in an educational institution conducted by the Fourth Respondent at nagthane in the Taluka and District of Satara. The service details regarding the Petitioner are as follows :i) Between 20th July, 1992 to 17th October, 1992; 11th July, 1993 to 4th June, 1994; 29th August, 1994 to 24th August, 1995; 2nd september, 1996 to 15th October, 1996 the Petitioner was appointed in leave vacancies; ii) From 20th July, 1998 to 30th April, 1999 the Petitioner was appointed on clock hour basis; iii) Between 12th October, 1999 till 19th June, 2000 the petitioner was appointed during the period of study leave of an existing teacher by a local selection committee; iv) Between 12th September, 2000 to 30th April, 2001, the appointment of the Petitioner was on a clock hour basis; v) On 21st June, 2002 the Petitioner was given a full time appointment for the year 2002-2003 upon selection by the local selection commit









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top