D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, KSHITIJ R.VYAS
Sudhir Narayan Sawant – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
( 1 ) RULE, returnable forthwith. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents waive service. By consent taken up for hearing and final disposal.
( 2 ) THE Petitioner is in the employment of the Fourth respondent as a lecturer and has been allotted to work in an educational institution conducted by the Fourth Respondent at nagthane in the Taluka and District of Satara. The service details regarding the Petitioner are as follows :i) Between 20th July, 1992 to 17th October, 1992; 11th July, 1993 to 4th June, 1994; 29th August, 1994 to 24th August, 1995; 2nd september, 1996 to 15th October, 1996 the Petitioner was appointed in leave vacancies; ii) From 20th July, 1998 to 30th April, 1999 the Petitioner was appointed on clock hour basis; iii) Between 12th October, 1999 till 19th June, 2000 the petitioner was appointed during the period of study leave of an existing teacher by a local selection committee; iv) Between 12th September, 2000 to 30th April, 2001, the appointment of the Petitioner was on a clock hour basis; v) On 21st June, 2002 the Petitioner was given a full time appointment for the year 2002-2003 upon selection by the local selection commit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.